HiCarry.........did I ever say that Ben is pro-2A or that he is not part of the Old Boy network? No I did not.
I said that Caldwell is an idiot and he's ineffectual. There has only been one single person better able to affect change in the C&C than Caldwell and that guy was Mufi. Rail.............yes I am pro Ben because of Rail. I am also against Caldwell because as the #2 person in the C&C it was his responsibility to run the C&C while Mufi wasn't around. Under their watch you are looking at EPA mandated improvements to the sewer systems or massive fines will be levied. This is in addition to the EPA already fining the C&C. The cost for the changes will affect all the tax payers of the C&C, there is no bailout from the tourists via a 0.5% tax increase. The cost for the sewer improvements will be more than the original cost of Rail.
The fact of the matter is Mufi, Caldwell, Carlisle, Ben............they are part of the problem. The issue in my mind is that Ben is the least problematic. I have never said anything else.
You get angry and bent when I voice my opinions about Caldwell.........well guess what I am still waiting for answers on what he has done as the #2 person in the C&C. I am still waiting for the plan to make improvements to Kokohead given that he was supposed to get that on his desk several days after he met with you. What did he say when you guys had your follow up meeting? What did he do as far as directing changes? We all know here that the budget for Kokohead + the other area lumped in with it is in the several hundreds of thousands of dollars.........where are the changes?
You may not have said Ben was "pro-gun" but you certainly inferred that he was by asking what Caldwell did for the shooting community. As for the follow up on the plans for the improvements discussed at the shooting range, he was following up and did have plans for moving forward. Unfortunately all those plans were dashed when he was not elected. Instead Carlisle was elected and.....
GZ - I am not "angry" or "bent" over anything....you have every right to voice your opinion. All I was attempting to point out is that you seem to saying Caldwell is not really "pro-2A" because he hasn't done anything for the shooting community. I was pointing out that neither has Cayetano, who you seem to support over Caldwell. You then seem to accuse Caldwell of being part of the problem, part of the old boy network you identify as part of the problem as you perceive it. It is you that seemed to get "bent" over this by saying that you never said Ben wasn't part of that same old boy problem you accuse Caldwell of being.
As I have said, numerous times, there are a multitude of issues one might use to determine for whom to vote. I have focused my reasons for supporting Caldwell solely on gun rights issues. You ask what Caldwell has done and I have offered you my observations and interpretations of those actions. You may use that as you see fit in making your voting choices.
You're right, I can not find an instance where you said Ben was pro-2A, but you seemed to infer it when challenging Caldwell's 2A accomplishments and support. IMHO, It does seem a little disingenuous to challenge so vociferously Caldwell's 2A support/accomplishments and then leave out any evaluation of Ben's......
This should be a "friendly" discussion about the merits of various candidates, and in this forum, their respective views and support of 2A issues. We should be able to do this without assuming anyone is angry or bent....mainly because regardless of the outcome of this election, we all will need to come together to continue fighting for our 2A rights....so, if I have somehow offended you, or caused you to believe I was attacking your view, I was not. I was simply trying to provide my view, based on my personal interactions and observations of the Candidate that I believe would best serve the interests and issues of Hawaii's shooters. I purposefully avoided other issues because, well, this is a firearms forum.
Aloha