Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not? (Read 30742 times)

GZire

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2012, 04:20:22 PM »

Funtimes

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2012, 06:05:35 PM »
..............and what has Caldwell accomplished?  Again, he has accomplished nothing.  You stated that he told his staff he wanted to see why the C&C could do something...........where is it?  Did Kirk share that with you?  Caldwell is part of the Old Boy Network.  I personally feel his is part of the problem, not part of the solution. 

Also having the stones and the brains to do things is something else entirely.  He is a grade A moron.  One only has to watch the debates to see that.  As Director I remember seeing him on TV during a debate where is has 0 awareness of what his project entailed, the only person on the panel (including the moderator) who was unaware of what the City proposal was stating.  Take a look at the lies that Mufi, Caldwell, & Carlisle have perpetuated regarding Rail.  Do you not remember how we were guaranteed $3B and now it's acknowledged by those same people as $5.5+B?  Do you not remember how the C&C knew of redesign issues required by the Airport 1 year in advance of the required changes?  Probably not...............nor probably do you remember how this cost $125M in changes.  Just think what a fraction of that could do to help all the people of the C&C.  What about the rumored 10,000 additional jobs from Rail?  Well Rail is stopped right now and by accounts Kiewit laid off approximately 30 people.


Make no mistake about it, this upcoming election for the Mayors race is primarily regarding Rail will have a long lasting impact on the State of Hawaii and Oahu especially easily for the next 50+ years.  All this while we have $3B in EPA mandated changes or we will be fined more money.  Think about that.......in the next 10 years we need to come up with $10B in changes............the people in charge at the C&C have done nothing to address these issues.

Yes, but many people forget in the context of this forum, most of us are looking at 2A viable candidates.  This may mean just who doesn't hate as much as the next guy does lol.  I hope that people are not just making the decision off of 2A; although, arguably, I think it is one of the more important amendments if we need to defend the other stuff.
Check out the Hawaii Defense Foundation.
HDF on Facebook
Defender of the Accused in Arkansas Courts
Posts are not legal advice & are my own, unless said so.

ren

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2012, 06:33:53 PM »
Obama if you want to depend on the govt.
Deeds Not Words

Heavies

GZire

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #24 on: October 01, 2012, 01:47:48 PM »
Yes, but many people forget in the context of this forum, most of us are looking at 2A viable candidates.  This may mean just who doesn't hate as much as the next guy does lol.  I hope that people are not just making the decision off of 2A; although, arguably, I think it is one of the more important amendments if we need to defend the other stuff.


.............again C, I ask what has Caldwell actually accomplished that was Pro-2A?

I remember the State & C&C saying they supported an Oahu racetrack and what did they do?  One thing is Jack and I'll let you decide what the other was.



Hate me because I'm so cynical now, but I am at the point that I don't care what a person says they are going to do.  I view them by what they actually have done or are able to do.  Doesn't help me if the guy wants to do this or that.  If he is incapable of getting things done, no matter how much I agree with his point of view, why should I vote for him?  The Managing Director is #2 behind the Mayor and when the Mayor is away, he's the acting Mayor.

Caldwell is part of the problem that has allowed the C&C to elevate taxes while reducing services.  He's part of the problem that resulted in the EPA fining the C&C and mandating billions in changes.  He's part of the problem with covering up the Rail lies.  He's also part of the problem with lack of upkeep at Kokohead.  If you feel that as #2 he can hide behind Mufi, then we greatly disagree.  I will leave you with my original question...........what has Caldwell actually accomplished that was Pro-2A?

crazy cat

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #25 on: October 01, 2012, 04:09:38 PM »
Romney was anti-gun while he was Governor of MA, now he claims to be pro gun.  I still remember Bush the Elder claiming to be pro gun, and then stabbing the NRA in the back once he was elected.  Obama signed the bill legalizing concealed carry in the National Parks, and has generally been leaving gun owners alone.  I have my own issues with Mr. Hopey-Changey; too bad the Republicans couldn't come up with a credible candidate.....

HiCarry

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #26 on: October 05, 2012, 12:26:01 PM »
..............and what has Caldwell accomplished?  Again, he has accomplished nothing.  You stated that he told his staff he wanted to see why the C&C could do something...........where is it?  Did Kirk share that with you?  Caldwell is part of the Old Boy Network.  I personally feel his is part of the problem, not part of the solution. 

Also having the stones and the brains to do things is something else entirely.  He is a grade A moron.  One only has to watch the debates to see that.  As Director I remember seeing him on TV during a debate where is has 0 awareness of what his project entailed, the only person on the panel (including the moderator) who was unaware of what the City proposal was stating.  Take a look at the lies that Mufi, Caldwell, & Carlisle have perpetuated regarding Rail.  Do you not remember how we were guaranteed $3B and now it's acknowledged by those same people as $5.5+B?  Do you not remember how the C&C knew of redesign issues required by the Airport 1 year in advance of the required changes?  Probably not...............nor probably do you remember how this cost $125M in changes.  Just think what a fraction of that could do to help all the people of the C&C.  What about the rumored 10,000 additional jobs from Rail?  Well Rail is stopped right now and by accounts Kiewit laid off approximately 30 people.


Make no mistake about it, this upcoming election for the Mayors race is primarily regarding Rail will have a long lasting impact on the State of Hawaii and Oahu especially easily for the next 50+ years.  All this while we have $3B in EPA mandated changes or we will be fined more money.  Think about that.......in the next 10 years we need to come up with $10B in changes............the people in charge at the C&C have done nothing to address these issues.
GZ - If that is the criteria you are using, then why don't you ask what Ben has done for the shooting community? Absolutely nothing!

I was not involved with, or have I spoken to Ben or his campaign about 2A issues when he was Gov. I do know that he supported yearly registration of all firearms and restrictions on buying ammunition. I also saw a video where he said he wouldn't stand in the way of any one wanting to pass gun control laws.

You keep coming back to issues other than those related to 2A support. I will admit that rail may be a determining factor for many voters, and it is up to individuals to determine which issues will influence the way they vote. It is interesting that while you seem to favor Ben because of his current stand on rail, you seem to forget that he was a supporter until fairly recently....flip-flopping or change of conscious, I don't know. But he is by no means beyond reproach on either his rail or 2A stance.

So keep railing about how ineffective Caldwell is, or how he's part of the old boy network that is part of the problem, but at least admit Ben has the very same qualities....he is the epitome of the old boy network and I can think of nothing spectacular he accomplished during his tenure as Gov. Certainly he wasn't able to do anything for the shooting community....so, once again, I can only say that when I and other members of the shooting community met with him, he was, in all of our opinions, genuine in his concern of our issues, he was committed to improving the range, he was not afraid to tell his people (who were trying their best to find any excuse to NOT improve the range or work with those that would/could)  to work on solutions, and that he has consistently addressed our issues and come out to many shooting events to show his active support of shooters and shooting sports.....that is a hell of a lot more than I have seen from Ben.

GZire

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #27 on: October 05, 2012, 01:19:57 PM »
HiCarry.........did I ever say that Ben is pro-2A or that he is not part of the Old Boy network?  No I did not.

I said that Caldwell is an idiot and he's ineffectual.  There has only been one single person better able to affect change in the C&C than Caldwell and that guy was Mufi.  Rail.............yes I am pro Ben because of Rail.  I am also against Caldwell because as the #2 person in the C&C it was his responsibility to run the C&C while Mufi wasn't around.  Under their watch you are looking at EPA mandated improvements to the sewer systems or massive fines will be levied.  This is in addition to the EPA already fining the C&C.  The cost for the changes will affect all the tax payers of the C&C, there is no bailout from the tourists via a 0.5% tax increase.  The cost for the sewer improvements will be more than the original cost of Rail.

The fact of the matter is Mufi, Caldwell, Carlisle, Ben............they are part of the problem.  The issue in my mind is that Ben is the least problematic.  I have never said anything else.

You get angry and bent when I voice my opinions about Caldwell.........well guess what I am still waiting for answers on what he has done as the #2 person in the C&C.  I am still waiting for the plan to make improvements to Kokohead given that he was supposed to get that on his desk several days after he met with you.  What did he say when you guys had your follow up meeting?  What did he do as far as directing changes?  We all know here that the budget for Kokohead + the other area lumped in with it is in the several hundreds of thousands of dollars.........where are the changes?

GZire

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #28 on: October 05, 2012, 06:42:10 PM »
Wastewater upgrades starting;

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/19742164/plans-for-massive-wastewater-tunnel-in-windward-oahu



Quote
Plans for massive wastewater tunnel in Windward Oahu

Posted: Oct 04, 2012 10:07 PM
Updated: Oct 04, 2012 11:39 PM

By Ben Gutierrez

KAILUA, OAHU (HawaiiNewsNow) -
City officials are pushing for a project in which in a three-mile-long tunnel, about ten to 13 feet in diameter, would be built to carry wastewater from Kaneohe to Kailua.
 
The tunnel would replace an aging 42-inch force main under Kaneohe Bay Drive. Engineers said it is needed to prevent a disaster similar to the one that happened in Waikiki in 2006, when a similar force main failed.
 
"There is only one force main that carries all that water, and if anything should happen to the force main, if it goes down like the one in Waikiki, there's the potential for major spillage in Kaneohe Bay until that force main can be repaired," said Earl Matsukawa of the engineering firm Wilson Okomoto Corporation.
 
Matsukawa and others showed the plans to the Kailua Neighborhood Board Thursday night.
 
The tunnel would be built beneath the Oneawa Hills area of Kailua, mauka of Kaneohe Bay Drive. The project would include improvements to the Kaneohe Wastewater Pre-Treatment Facility and the Kailua Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Engineers said it would cost a total of about $280 million dollars, and take five years to complete.
 
Some neighborhood board members are still skeptical about the project.
 
"This is absolute madness," said board member Ron Weinberg. "What is the value of it? What is the value added? Why are you doing this?"
 
Matsukawa reiterated the risk that a force mail failure would spill sewage into Kaneohe Bay. He also noted that some residents along the tunnel's proposed route are worried about the digging that will be required.

"Many of the concerns are related to the unstable soil conditions in some of the residences, and some of the concerns that vibrations from the tunnel boring machines could aggravate soil conditions and possibly cause property damage," he said.
 
Questions also were raised about what would be done with the material dug up by the machines, and if they would be trucked along Quarry Road. "Everybody is aware of the very poor condition of the Quarry Road, and if it is decided to take a hundred trucks a day, for years, years, over that road, what is the impact going to be?" asked board member Donna Wong.
 
Matsukawa said that ultimately, it would be up to the company that eventually gets the contract to do the work.
 
Public hearings will be held next month on the project, which is estimated at $280 million. Construction is scheduled to begin in November 2013, and take five years to complete.

Old Guy

rated d
« Reply #29 on: October 06, 2012, 06:38:21 PM »
FWIW, for my 2 cents, I'll pick Caldwell over Cayatano.

City engineers have Lost the knowledge that the old Retired guys have. 

I think they will be in for  a Very Rude surprise when the tunnel boring machines start drilling.

As #2 under Mufi, Caldwell just can't go and change things as he see fit, Mufi is still in charge.

As I said before, Mufi inherited problems CAUSED by Jeremy.

If Rail is your main concern, then vote for Ben.  But, give very Serious consideration to what he Says and What consequences there are

if Rail is Totally Stopped.   

Just What Legal ramifications will there be.  Some one(the Tax Payer) will be footing the Ultimate bill, Win, Loose or Draw.

As far as Which politician to vote for, do your Homework.

Linda Lingle,  put 17 Conservative Judges in the Sate Judiciary.  Abercrombie is Now filling Judicial Appointments with Very Left wing LIBERAL Judges.

Some of you are very Naive about local Politics.  There is a Lot of Behind the Scens Activity that you don't know about

Just because a person is A rated and elected into office doesn't mean he/she can work miracles.  Politics is a Give and Take situation, Compromises must

be made if a politician wants Enough Support to get his/her Bill passed thru Committee and the House and Senate.

Many politicians have Never Worked a Real job.  Idealist liberals have no clue what the REAL world is about.

If one of them is Your Rep/Senator, then it is your job to "educate" them to what Real Life is all about.

What you do Not want to do is to Piss them off and alienate them to the 2A viewpoint.

My 2 cents, for what it's worth.

GZire

Re: rated d
« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2012, 09:33:44 AM »
City engineers have Lost the knowledge that the old Retired guys have.

I think they will be in for  a Very Rude surprise when the tunnel boring machines start drilling.

As #2 under Mufi, Caldwell just can't go and change things as he see fit, Mufi is still in charge.

As I said before, Mufi inherited problems CAUSED by Jeremy.

If Rail is your main concern, then vote for Ben.  But, give very Serious consideration to what he Says and What consequences there are

if Rail is Totally Stopped.   

Just What Legal ramifications will there be.  Some one(the Tax Payer) will be footing the Ultimate bill, Win, Loose or Draw.

As far as Which politician to vote for, do your Homework.

Linda Lingle,  put 17 Conservative Judges in the Sate Judiciary.  Abercrombie is Now filling Judicial Appointments with Very Left wing LIBERAL Judges.

Some of you are very Naive about local Politics.  There is a Lot of Behind the Scens Activity that you don't know about

Just because a person is A rated and elected into office doesn't mean he/she can work miracles.  Politics is a Give and Take situation, Compromises must

be made if a politician wants Enough Support to get his/her Bill passed thru Committee and the House and Senate.

Many politicians have Never Worked a Real job.  Idealist liberals have no clue what the REAL world is about.

If one of them is Your Rep/Senator, then it is your job to "educate" them to what Real Life is all about.

What you do Not want to do is to Piss them off and alienate them to the 2A viewpoint.

My 2 cents, for what it's worth.


Yes Mufi inherited problems as is true with all politicians who are new to the office.  In my mind, the question is what have people done when in office?  Mufi did 0 with the sewers.  It was a well known issue and nothing was done.  To date Mufi, then Caldwell, and now Carlisle have done nothing.  It is hitting a point where something must be done.  Don't really know if it's the right direction to try and pursue a 10'-13' dia X 3 mile long tunnel from Kaneohe to Kailua.  Really a lot of issues started with Harris.

With regards to "As #2 under Mufi, Caldwell just can't go and change things as he see fit, Mufi is still in charge," you will notice that as part of his duties as #2 he is to oversee C&C functions of which the BWS is one.  In private practice (usually) if people are ineffective, they get fired.  This is not the case with the Govt.  There needs to be accountability in Government and if we are saying that as the #2 person he is not accountable, I feel that is a dangerous thing to say.  We need to hold everyone accountable.  From the lower level managers to the Mayor. 



Now with regards to Rail.  Yes the tax payers will bear the cost, however we need to remember that people buying products on Oahu pay this tax.  This means that the burden is also carried by the tourists coming into Oahu and persons from the outer islands who purchase products here.  With the sewer this will be carried by the property owners and those who pay BWS fees.  Again not solely the people of Oahu as the tourists will pay their share in the cost of their rooms as well.

Rail - costs...............the C&C has really botched this project from the inception to implementation to administering it.  We are already at some $20 million for the first two contract change orders.  While this is a huge sum of money it is nothing compared to the what $150 million (?) that was required due to Mufi withholding information on the required realignment near the airport.  You add these two and it's far less than the $5.X billion that it will cost to build Rail.  This is before you figure in what it will cost to subsidize Rail in the future.  This is a price that you folks with fixed incomes will have to bear in the short term.  Old Guy you are going to get stuck with this.  I pay next, but I'm not retired so I have some means to make it up.  Then next we look at our descendents as they will pay the next costs for the following 50, 60, 70, 80 years? 

If others think that payment duration is not realistic, then think again.  A lot of what I do is repair existing structures.  Structures that are designed for working lives of 50 years and are now getting to 70, 80, and in the case of Honolulu Harbor nearly 90+ years.  We band-aid these structures at added costs to outright replacement.

GZire

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2012, 09:34:45 AM »
^^^BTW Old Guy I do appreciate your input as the more perspectives and knowledge we share the better we are able to make our own informed decisions.

ren

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2012, 11:32:06 AM »
Lingle and Djou were at the gun show. It was also good to see our old HING TAG there supporting her as well. I remember when he and the ex HPD chief wanted to ban 50 cals. One of the reasons why it is so difficult for me to cough up funds for HNGA every year.
Deeds Not Words

HiCarry

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #33 on: October 09, 2012, 05:30:02 PM »
HiCarry.........did I ever say that Ben is pro-2A or that he is not part of the Old Boy network?  No I did not.

I said that Caldwell is an idiot and he's ineffectual.  There has only been one single person better able to affect change in the C&C than Caldwell and that guy was Mufi.  Rail.............yes I am pro Ben because of Rail.  I am also against Caldwell because as the #2 person in the C&C it was his responsibility to run the C&C while Mufi wasn't around.  Under their watch you are looking at EPA mandated improvements to the sewer systems or massive fines will be levied.  This is in addition to the EPA already fining the C&C.  The cost for the changes will affect all the tax payers of the C&C, there is no bailout from the tourists via a 0.5% tax increase.  The cost for the sewer improvements will be more than the original cost of Rail.

The fact of the matter is Mufi, Caldwell, Carlisle, Ben............they are part of the problem.  The issue in my mind is that Ben is the least problematic.  I have never said anything else.

You get angry and bent when I voice my opinions about Caldwell.........well guess what I am still waiting for answers on what he has done as the #2 person in the C&C.  I am still waiting for the plan to make improvements to Kokohead given that he was supposed to get that on his desk several days after he met with you.  What did he say when you guys had your follow up meeting?  What did he do as far as directing changes?  We all know here that the budget for Kokohead + the other area lumped in with it is in the several hundreds of thousands of dollars.........where are the changes?
You may not have said Ben was "pro-gun" but you certainly inferred that he was by asking what Caldwell did for the shooting community. As for the follow up on the plans for the improvements discussed at the shooting range, he was following up and did have plans for moving forward. Unfortunately all those plans were dashed when he was not elected. Instead Carlisle was elected and.....

GZ - I am not "angry" or "bent" over anything....you have every right to voice your opinion. All I was attempting to point out is that you seem to saying Caldwell is not really "pro-2A" because he hasn't done anything for the shooting community. I was pointing out that neither has Cayetano, who you seem to support over Caldwell. You then seem to accuse Caldwell of being part of the problem, part of the old boy network you identify as part of the problem as you perceive it. It is you that seemed to get "bent" over this by saying that you never said Ben wasn't part of that same old boy problem you accuse Caldwell of being.

As I have said, numerous times, there are a multitude of issues one might use to determine for whom to vote. I have focused my reasons for supporting Caldwell solely on gun rights issues. You ask what Caldwell has done and I have offered you my observations and interpretations of those actions. You may use that as you see fit in making your voting choices.

You're right, I can not find an instance where you said Ben was pro-2A, but you seemed to infer it when challenging Caldwell's 2A accomplishments and support. IMHO, It does seem a little disingenuous to challenge so vociferously Caldwell's 2A support/accomplishments and then leave out any evaluation of Ben's......

This should be a "friendly" discussion about the merits of various candidates, and in this forum, their respective views and support of 2A issues. We should be able to do this without assuming anyone is angry or bent....mainly because regardless of the outcome of this election, we all will need to come together to continue fighting for our 2A rights....so, if I have somehow offended you, or caused you to believe I was attacking your view, I was not. I was simply trying to provide my view, based on my personal interactions and observations of the Candidate that I believe would best serve the interests and issues of Hawaii's shooters. I purposefully avoided other issues because, well, this is a firearms forum.

Aloha

ren

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #34 on: October 10, 2012, 03:46:12 PM »
Deeds Not Words

GZire

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #35 on: October 11, 2012, 09:07:13 AM »
You may not have said Ben was "pro-gun" but you certainly inferred that he was by asking what Caldwell did for the shooting community. As for the follow up on the plans for the improvements discussed at the shooting range, he was following up and did have plans for moving forward. Unfortunately all those plans were dashed when he was not elected. Instead Carlisle was elected and.....

GZ - I am not "angry" or "bent" over anything....you have every right to voice your opinion. All I was attempting to point out is that you seem to saying Caldwell is not really "pro-2A" because he hasn't done anything for the shooting community. I was pointing out that neither has Cayetano, who you seem to support over Caldwell. You then seem to accuse Caldwell of being part of the problem, part of the old boy network you identify as part of the problem as you perceive it. It is you that seemed to get "bent" over this by saying that you never said Ben wasn't part of that same old boy problem you accuse Caldwell of being.

As I have said, numerous times, there are a multitude of issues one might use to determine for whom to vote. I have focused my reasons for supporting Caldwell solely on gun rights issues. You ask what Caldwell has done and I have offered you my observations and interpretations of those actions. You may use that as you see fit in making your voting choices.

You're right, I can not find an instance where you said Ben was pro-2A, but you seemed to infer it when challenging Caldwell's 2A accomplishments and support. IMHO, It does seem a little disingenuous to challenge so vociferously Caldwell's 2A support/accomplishments and then leave out any evaluation of Ben's......

This should be a "friendly" discussion about the merits of various candidates, and in this forum, their respective views and support of 2A issues. We should be able to do this without assuming anyone is angry or bent....mainly because regardless of the outcome of this election, we all will need to come together to continue fighting for our 2A rights....so, if I have somehow offended you, or caused you to believe I was attacking your view, I was not. I was simply trying to provide my view, based on my personal interactions and observations of the Candidate that I believe would best serve the interests and issues of Hawaii's shooters. I purposefully avoided other issues because, well, this is a firearms forum.

Aloha

I disagree HiCarry.

I have never said or implied that Ben was pro-2A.  I have always and still maintain that this race for Mayor is built around the Rail.  This is the case while not one of the candidates is even talking about the EPA mandated changes to Oahu's sewer system. Changes which will be nearly as much as the Rail.

just because I said Caldwell has done squat doesn't mean that I am saying or implying that Ben is pro-2A and it's unfortunate that you interpreted it that way.  I did ask about the report that Caldwell promised and I have yet to see if he came up with that.  Did Caldwell give you his peoples findings?  You mentioned it and I asked for it before.  I am asking for it again.  Did Caldwell come up with the reports and if so what did they say?  I also point to the fact that while Caldwell only spent several months as Mayor, he was still the Mayor and I think if he was truly motivated to do so, could have made changes.

So in no uncertain terms I will say it again;
I have never said or implied that Ben was pro-2A.  This race for Mayor is built around the Rail.  The next Mayor will also need to deal with several billion dollars of EPA mandated changes to Oahu's sewer system.


I certainly hope that if Caldwell wins that I am totally wrong about him and his support of 2A issues. 

I will also say that I understand that you are focusing your discussion of Mayor on 2A issues, however the title of this thread is "Politicians to Support in 2012 -  Why or Why not?"  The title is not "Which Politicians are 2A" because you folks at HRA already put that out.

HiCarry

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #36 on: October 11, 2012, 09:27:44 AM »
I disagree HiCarry.

I have never said or implied that Ben was pro-2A.  I have always and still maintain that this race for Mayor is built around the Rail.  This is the case while not one of the candidates is even talking about the EPA mandated changes to Oahu's sewer system. Changes which will be nearly as much as the Rail.

just because I said Caldwell has done squat doesn't mean that I am saying or implying that Ben is pro-2A and it's unfortunate that you interpreted it that way.  I did ask about the report that Caldwell promised and I have yet to see if he came up with that.  Did Caldwell give you his peoples findings?  You mentioned it and I asked for it before.  I am asking for it again.  Did Caldwell come up with the reports and if so what did they say?  I also point to the fact that while Caldwell only spent several months as Mayor, he was still the Mayor and I think if he was truly motivated to do so, could have made changes.

So in no uncertain terms I will say it again;
I have never said or implied that Ben was pro-2A.  This race for Mayor is built around the Rail.  The next Mayor will also need to deal with several billion dollars of EPA mandated changes to Oahu's sewer system.


I certainly hope that if Caldwell wins that I am totally wrong about him and his support of 2A issues. 

I will also say that I understand that you are focusing your discussion of Mayor on 2A issues, however the title of this thread is "Politicians to Support in 2012 -  Why or Why not?"  The title is not "Which Politicians are 2A" because you folks at HRA already put that out.

GZ - Caldwell was Acting Mayor from 20 July to 11 October 2010, less than 3 months. If I recall correctly, we met with him mid-to late September. Did we get a report from his people? No. But I didn't hold that against him as he was out of office just a few weeks after we met. And, if you somehow believe that even a motivated person could accomplish any meaningful changes within that short period of time, especially when working with uncooperative City employees who know "you" could be out of office in a few short weeks, you simply don't understand how slowly the wheels of government turn....or you are imposing unrealistic expectations on him because of your personal bias.

Bottom line - If you want a pro-gun candidate who has been truely interested and involved in "our" issues, it is my opinion that Caldwell is the guy.

Aloha

Jl808

Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #37 on: October 11, 2012, 11:02:54 AM »
Re mayoral election, I think Cayetano is the only right choice. Caldwell cannot do anything for the community because he is for rail.

The rail is a giant money pit that has been draining city funds, taking money away from repairs and upkeep of city infrastructure (including parks and the range) and pocketing those money for the special interest in this state... big money and big labor. Caldwell is another spokesperson for those special interests and what those guys are doing is disgusting IMO.  PRP continues to spend millions spewing lies because they are deficient in facts.



Ben Cayetano is the only one in this mayoral election that is making sense. And he is the only one with the balls to stand up and speak against what is wrong.



I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

GZire

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #38 on: October 11, 2012, 05:36:06 PM »
GZ - Caldwell was Acting Mayor from 20 July to 11 October 2010, less than 3 months. If I recall correctly, we met with him mid-to late September. Did we get a report from his people? No. But I didn't hold that against him as he was out of office just a few weeks after we met. And, if you somehow believe that even a motivated person could accomplish any meaningful changes within that short period of time, especially when working with uncooperative City employees who know "you" could be out of office in a few short weeks, you simply don't understand how slowly the wheels of government turn....or you are imposing unrealistic expectations on him because of your personal bias.

Bottom line - If you want a pro-gun candidate who has been truely interested and involved in "our" issues, it is my opinion that Caldwell is the guy.

Aloha


HiCarry I respect your opinion. I do also appreciate that you folks are sharing your experiences with us. I think that insight such as that is extremely helpful and much better as it allows a more transparent view of the workings of Government.


Now that being said; I just don't happen to agree with your assessments.  ;)


Yes I get that Caldwell was a lame duck, however are we to vote for someone who does not command enough respect that the people that work for him will do what he says?  Are we to vote for someone who is ineffective?  Or are we to consider that he really was not as interested as he led you to believe?  Has anyone ever seen Caldwell at the Shooting Sports Fair, the Gun Show, the range, a firearms store?  I personally have not heard of that happening.

With regards to not knowing how "quickly" Government works I again disagree.  I have worked in the private sector with City, State, and Federal Governments.  I see how quickly things get done when the people in charge want things to be done. 

My question to you is how long do you think is a reasonable time to affect change if you are the Mayor and you already have a budget of several hundred thousand dollars for a park sector?  Is one year reasonable?  Are you talking two years, three years?  What is reasonable to get a toilet cleaned regularly at Kokohead?  What about put up the small housing structure that you mentioned?


We as taxpayers must demand accountability.  I agree that none of the candidates are our perfect person, but I do feel that the actions are not living up to the hype.  I will again say; I certainly hope that if Caldwell wins that I am totally wrong about him and his support of 2A issues. 

Old Guy

Re: Politicians to Support in 2012 - Why or Why not?
« Reply #39 on: October 11, 2012, 10:28:35 PM »
Here are some of the politicos who showed up at the gun show:   http://lifehawaii.com/Recent.html

For the Record, Caldwell was there and I did have an oppertunity  to "bend" his ear.
 
For being a gun owner, Ben was not there on Saturday, I was there almost all day.

Don't know about Sunday.

As far as 2A is concerned, would you rather have C rated senator or an F rated senator in congress.

Don't forget, if the Council is Anti 2A can a Pro 2A mayor make things happen?  Just askin.

Rail is Not in the Constitution.  Guns are.

Rail is only money and can be replaced.

Guns are a Right, once lost, it can Not be replaced.

Something to think about

Your Choice, Your Vote.