That is not the type of NDA Trump made whitehouse staff sign.
His NDA tried to prohibit workers from every saying anything disparaging about Trump or his family for the rest of their lives.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-cant-legally-make-new-staff-sign-ndasyet
These NDAs aren't about legitimate sensitive information. These NDAs aren't even government NDAs, they are private NDAs with Trump himself.
"You can’t govern publicly funded speech interactions with private agreements this way, in all likelihood; the enforcement mechanism would have to be governmental, and that would probably violate the First Amendment. Leaking classified material is already illegal, and President Trump can fire leakers of non-classified material, but NDAs between Trump himself and people like Omarosa would face serious difficulties. In McGehee v. Casey (DC Circuit, 1983), for example, the court said “The government has no legitimate interest in censoring unclassified materials.”"
https://peltthepundits.com/2018/08/trump-omarosa-signed-an-nda-but-is-it-binding
Here is your original question: “So does it bother anyone that Trump made Whitehouse staff sign non-disclosure agreements?”
Please tell me what these article you posted have anything to do with the NDA’s that the whitehouse staff signed? Did you even read the articles? Obviously not.
First of all, in the Daily Beast article, it was written on 2016 BEFORE Trump even became president. So no one knows what the NDA signed by Whitehouse staff even looks like. You predicate the proof for your question on an article with the assumption that the NDA signed by Whitehouse staff says exactly what an NDA from an old employee of Trump had written in it from 2016? You really jumped the shark with this one.
Second, the Whitehouse staff works for the government. Technically speaking Trump could not legally force anyone through an NDA to not say anything bad about him.
Third, the article from The Pundits basically says the same thing I just did. “So, we’ll have to see the scope of the Trump NDA’s.” We don’t know yet what the NDA that Omarosa signed says. If it says what everyone thinks it does, and it is with Trump himself and not the government, then you might have a point. But the article even admits that until we see the NDA, no one really knows! This includes you.
Sorry, I prefer to deal with truth, facts and provide clarity. If you want my opinion, then base it on a set of facts already known or ask the question and base it upon a predication. In other words, ask “Does it bother anyone that Trump have may have asked Whitehouse employees to sign an NDA that keeps them from speaking ill of Trump?” I don’t want to discuss what could be based on your fake question based on knowledge that you claim you know what the NDA that the whitehouse staff actually signed. And you use an articles that base their discussion on what “could be” rather than what really is to try and show your question has any validity? Your question asks if any one is bothered about what is in the NDA without even knowing what is in the NDA? When the facts come out about what is in the NDA and with whom the NDA is with, then you might have a point here. I’m done discussing this with you.