Sorry, I don't get my news or base any of my views from the mainstream media. Second of all, fascism has many meanings other that one you stated. Fascism is also a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism). Hence, it is a word that can also be used to described instances where police officers go beyond their SOPs and engage in acts of brutality.
Yes, you can do what you prescribe, if the cops do not kill you first.
There have been a number of unjustifiable killings committed by fascist cops, if you have not noticed recently (e.g., George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, etc.).
You mean the same HPD who are trying to ban standard capacity long gun magazines at this year's legislature?
I agree with your expanding the meaning of the 2nd Amendment, but the true meaning of the 2nd Amendment lies more with arming and maintaining a regulated militia, in lieu of a standing army.
But the problem is, you are labeling cops as fascist. I do not see a specific example of cops systemically using any sort of doctoral control or autocratic principles within America. The problem is, you are using few and far in between examples to label an entirety. Can individual cops have fascist ideas, sure, so can individual nurses, doctors, politicians, lawyers, garden men, etc. But to state that the whole is fascist, is ignorance at best.
It is just as ignorant as saying “if the cops do not kill you first” the problem with that statement is that is is implying that it is the common or norm for a cop to use lethal force before any means necessary. When we dig deeper into your point about minorities, its interesting because if we look at government data, a total of 228 civilians were killed by cops this year, but only 31 were black, the majority are white. So why is there this huge argument that cops are going out and killing minorities at a substantial rate?
The fact that you stated, “the same cops pushing for legislature to ban magazines” nullifies your argument about fascism. Last time i checked, fascim doesn’t have checks and balances, if the police were fascist, they could ban it outright on their own. If that is not the case, then you are somehow implying that HPD is in control of Ihara, Kahele, Wakai, Thielen, Shimabukuro, Morikawa, Chang, and Nishihara who are all elected officials? Because they are the ones who introduced the Bill. Now if you are saying they are all working for HPD like how the msm says republican politicians “work for the NRA” then that’s fair, but doesn’t make it true.
The militia was not limited to being a standing army. there are numerous founding fathers who made this explicit in their explanations. George Washington stated “A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government” No where do they mention the people fighting for the government, but rather to protect themselves from the government itself. James Madison who was initially opposed to the idea also stated, " That a well-regulated militia is the proper, natural and safe defence of a free government".