That is not the issue.

The issue Is whether shooting a suspect, in the back, is the correct course of action, if the goal was to apprehend the suspect?

if blake complied, he would have been apprehended and not shot...

even after having a beer, your boss is an asshole
he's just easier to take after I've had a beer or two...

He’s moved on to whiskey

if blake complied, he would have been apprehended and not shot...

Three cops.
Time to react to the situation.
They couldn’t apprehend him without shooting him (7 times) in the back while grabbing his shirt as he entered the vehicle which he had to walk a ways to with cops with guns drawn following him?
Why not use the grab the shirt technique 8 steps ago?
Or the minute the taser didn’t work?

Why not use the tackle and beat the shit out him technique HPD would have used if you don’t comply.
Do not run from HPD.
I don’t know about now, but back In the day, they wouldn’t shoot you, but if you ran, when they caught you.....

if blake complied, he would have been apprehended and not shot...

Still I agree. Stupid games stupid prizes.
If he complied he would not have been shot.
Seems to be a common theme in a lot of these.
Philando Castile is one of the most bothering for me personally.

Philando Castile is one of the most bothering for me personally.

Also the one we hear the least about for some reason

He’s moved on to whiskey

if he passes out, put his hand in a bowl of warm water...

Matthews said officers made multiple requests to Blake to drop the knife, but he was uncooperative. He said officers used a Taser on Blake, but it did not incapacitate him.
“Blake forcefully fought with the officers, including putting one of the officers in a headlock,” Matthews said. A second stun from a Taser also did not stop him, he said.
As Blake opened the driver’s door of the SUV, Sheskey pulled on Blake’s shirt and then opened fire. Blake’s three children were in the backseat.
“Based on the inability to gain compliance and control after using verbal, physical and less-lethal means, the officers drew their firearms,” Matthews said. “Mr. Blake continued to ignore the officers’ commands, even with the threat of lethal force now present.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kenosha-police-union-gives-its-version-of-blake-shooting/ar-BB18tWPM?ocid=spartan-ntp-feeds

looks like they followed procedures and training...

"but what else is the evil police union going to say to defend all the bad officers"
in 5, 4, 3,...

Matthews said officers made multiple requests to Blake to drop the knife, but he was uncooperative. He said officers used a Taser on Blake, but it did not incapacitate him.
“Blake forcefully fought with the officers, including putting one of the officers in a headlock,” Matthews said. A second stun from a Taser also did not stop him, he said.
As Blake opened the driver’s door of the SUV, Sheskey pulled on Blake’s shirt and then opened fire. Blake’s three children were in the backseat.
“Based on the inability to gain compliance and control after using verbal, physical and less-lethal means, the officers drew their firearms,” Matthews said. “Mr. Blake continued to ignore the officers’ commands, even with the threat of lethal force now present.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kenosha-police-union-gives-its-version-of-blake-shooting/ar-BB18tWPM?ocid=spartan-ntp-feeds

looks like they followed procedures and training...

"but what else is the evil police union going to say to defend all the bad officers"
in 5, 4, 3,...

I might of missed something.

Can you show me, where did the police union say shooting suspects, to gain compliance, is part of their procedure?

I might of missed something.

Can you show me, where did the police union say shooting suspects, to gain compliance, is part of their procedure?

I’d say you missed a lot

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_force_continuum

I’d say you missed a lot

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_force_continuum

I did not know that the Kenosha Police Union bases their policies on Wikipedia articles.  I look forward to hearing them cite that Wikipedia article, during the eventual legal proceedings.

Thanks.   

I might of missed something.

Can you show me, where did the police union say shooting suspects, to gain compliance, is part of their procedure?

they didn't, because it's not...

they didn't, because it's not...

Thanks for the clarification.

Thanks for the clarification.

I shouldn't have to clarify...

I shouldn't have to clarify...

“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

― Mark Twain

they didn't, because it's not...

Sheldon. . .

if he passes out, put his hand in a bowl of warm water...

I dunno.  My boss is kind of an asshole.

“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

― Mark Twain

back in 1898...

I dunno.  My boss is kind of an asshole.

yeah, loose bowels would really be a kicker...................

Liberal Revised Use of Force Continuum

Liberal Revised Use of Force Continuum

“Officer did a great job in that video, do you see what happens when an officer doesn’t “shoot first and ask questions later”? What if the gun wasn’t loaded? Did the suspect intend to shoot the officer just because he pointed it at him?”                   
     
   —You know who, probably