You have lost track of the conversation and have no idea what you are talking about. What country are you in?

Back on topic so some unarmed people are trespassing on your property and you going to shoot them? Got a clue? Please read the words below "unarmed". He claimed he only fired a warning shot.

"Kelly is accused of fatally shooting Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, an unarmed 48-year-old migrant from Nogales, Mexico. Prosecutors have said Kelly had no basis for intentionally or recklessly firing an AK-47 rifle toward eight or so unarmed migrants about 80 to 100 yards (meters) away."

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/arizona-rancher-arraigned-in-mexican-mans-shooting-death

So people driving by in the back of a pickup with weapons and you are going to shoot them for no reason? We need more people like you in Texas. Seriously, you make me believe that we do need more firearm regulation/education/background checks. I did not think that way until I found this forum. You've changed my belief to where I support the current Hawaii laws and think we may need to do more. Your activism is working against you.

WTF are 'unarnmed people?"  You mean probable border jumpers which could be anything from drug runners, human traffickers or illegal aliens?  If they had anything with them that could be used as a bludgeon or stabbing weapon, they were not "unarmed."  More likely "less well armed" compared to the rancher.   

How does the prosecutor know all 8 were unarmed?  Because the ILLEGAL ALIENS told him?  Is it not possible that the armed men evaded the rancher and the unarmed people were too scared to run after hearing shots?

So far, no surprises.  You don't know what happened, just want to parrot what the prosecutor wants the jury to know.

There's no actual evidence the rancher fired on unarmed people, just testimony from SOME of the people he shot at.

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILtY

You have lost track of the conversation and have no idea what you are talking about. What country are you in?

Back on topic so some unarmed people are trespassing on your property and you going to shoot them? Got a clue? Please read the words below "unarmed". He claimed he only fired a warning shot.

"Kelly is accused of fatally shooting Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, an unarmed 48-year-old migrant from Nogales, Mexico. Prosecutors have said Kelly had no basis for intentionally or recklessly firing an AK-47 rifle toward eight or so unarmed migrants about 80 to 100 yards (meters) away."

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/arizona-rancher-arraigned-in-mexican-mans-shooting-death

So people driving by in the back of a pickup with weapons and you are going to shoot them for no reason? We need more people like you in Texas. Seriously, you make me believe that we do need more firearm regulation/education/background checks. I did not think that way until I found this forum. You've changed my belief to where I support the current Hawaii laws and think we may need to do more. Your activism is working against you.

No evidence

No evidence?

You do realize that the government has to find evidence of someone's guilty and not the other way around. The government doesn't get to take you to court and tell you to prove your innocence otherwise you are guilty.

So what is the evidence that the rancher fired without any legal justification?

No evidence?

You do realize that the government has to find evidence of someone's guilty and not the other way around. The government doesn't get to take you to court and tell you to prove your innocence otherwise you are guilty.

So what is the evidence that the rancher fired without any legal justification?

Maybe the Democrats follow a different set of rules when the defendant is someone they hate:

“No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence."
-- Nancy Pelosi

Pelosi ripped for tweet saying Trump can ‘prove innocence’ at trial
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/31/pelosi-ripped-tweet-saying-trump-can-prove-innocen/

The reasons Democrats aren't prosecuted as often is because they don't commit the crimes. If they had they would be indicted.

Amazing the people here proclaim innocent until proven guilty yet believe that it is okay to murder an unarmed trespasser.

The reasons Democrats aren't prosecuted as often is because they don't commit the crimes. If they had they would be indicted.

Amazing the people here proclaim innocent until proven guilty yet believe that it is okay to murder an unarmed trespasser.

The reasons Democrats aren't prosecuted as often is because they don't commit the crimes. If they had they would be indicted.

Amazing the people here proclaim innocent until proven guilty yet believe that it is okay to murder an unarmed trespasser.

The reasons Democrats aren't prosecuted as often is because they don't commit the crimes. If they had they would be indicted.

Amazing the people here proclaim innocent until proven guilty yet believe that it is okay to murder an unarmed trespasser.

What world do you live in?

 

See the system works when if they break they law they are prosecuted.

If it's true you should provide the evidence to a grand jury and have them indicted. The problem is you have no evidence and you are unable to cobble together a grand jury willing to indict. Sounds like you don't have any justification for your claims.

Did you even bother to read the story at the link you posted and look at the outcomes?

See the system works when if they break they law they are prosecuted. Now shouldn't that work for Republicans and Trumpers also?

I live in reality.. step out of your Maga bubble and come on over. I'll welcome you.