You obviously think human trafficking and interstate prostitution are okay in spite of state and federal laws.

Showing pornography at a public congressional hearing was not necessary even if the goal was to pursue some sort of human trafficking or prostitution charge. It was trashy making her trashy.

Showing pornography at a public congressional hearing was not necessary even if the goal was to pursue some sort of human trafficking or prostitution charge. It was trashy making her trashy.

In your opinion.

More of this needs to happen, because it's becomes harder for the media to say the things the Bidens are accused of never happened.

Showing pornography at a public congressional hearing was not necessary even if the goal was to pursue some sort of human trafficking or prostitution charge. It was trashy making her trashy.

You'd rather pretend like this isn't really happening and everything's okay, but MTG is gonna keep reminding you of the evil that infests our highest office until you snap out of your stupor or go insane. 

Showing pornography at a public congressional hearing was not necessary even if the goal was to pursue some sort of human trafficking or prostitution charge. It was trashy making her trashy.

For things like this, the left will deny or twist evidence to fit their needs. This way, it's on public record cause you know, in case the FBI looses the laptop and it's harder for the left to twist/lie about stuff.

Brandon went from "I never discussed business with my son" to changing the story.

"the president is not in business with hunter"
goalposts moved...

For things like this, the left will deny or twist evidence to fit their needs. This way, it's on public record cause you know, in case the FBI looses the laptop and it's harder for the left to twist/lie about stuff.

Brandon went from "I never discussed business with my son" to changing the story.

Showing pornography at a public congressional hearing was not necessary even if the goal was to pursue some sort of human trafficking or prostitution charge. It was trashy making her trashy.

No. She was just taking out the trash, aka Hunter Biden. She shined the light of day on the
crimes committed. Remember these are HUNTER'S pictures not MTG's. These are just a
sample of the truly obscene things documented by Joe's boy. Hunter's laptop has a ton of
misdeeds stored. Unfortunately the FBI is protecting the Bidens. They just sat on it for years.
Congress is our best hope to uphold truth, justice, and the American way. 

And another thing:

Remember when Adam Schiff conspired with what he thought were Russian officials?
This was the claim that they said they had "Sensateeve Mateerials, pictures of naked Trump"
There was no bloody out rage about this Russian collusion attempt.

But there's more:

Hunter is obviously in need of rehab. He also keeps making bad decisions. This could be a national
security concern. After all an impaired son of the president is the gate keeper to a mentally impaired
elderly old codger with issues who also is the POTUS. Now what could possibly go wrong? 
 

In your opinion.

well duh...

More of this needs to happen, because it's becomes harder for the media to say the things the Bidens are accused of never happened.

We need more trashy congressmen?

For things like this, the left will deny or twist evidence to fit their needs. This way, it's on public record cause you know, in case the FBI looses the laptop and it's harder for the left to twist/lie about stuff.

Brandon went from "I never discussed business with my son" to changing the story.

The photos of Hunter Biden's exploits were available to the public already.

There was no need for her to show these images in this manner. Doing so was salacious and of very little evidentiary value.

What case need to be proved to the American people? That Hunter Biden took naked photos with alleged prostitutes? That is not part of proving Biden was taking bribes. Congress needs to focus on the big crimes, the crimes that may have been comitted by Biden. The FBI is never going to chase someone down because they had a liaison with a prostitute nor is it worth congress' time.
What matters are bank records, phone calls, statements made, all things that would go to show significant corruption and bribery. This simply isn't one of them.

The photos of Hunter Biden's exploits were available to the public already.

There was no need for her to show these images in this manner. Doing so was salacious and of very little evidentiary value.

What case need to be proved to the American people? That Hunter Biden took naked photos with alleged prostitutes? That is not part of proving Biden was taking bribes. Congress needs to focus on the big crimes, the crimes that may have been comitted by Biden. The FBI is never going to chase someone down because they had a liaison with a prostitute nor is it worth congress' time.
What matters are bank records, phone calls, statements made, all things that would go to show significant corruption and bribery. This simply isn't one of them.

Hunter documented much more that what MTG had shown congress. His pics of adult prostitutes are just the tip of the iceberg.
As I said before, the FBI is protecting the Bidens. Congress will probably be the only avenue of getting to the truth.
We cannot expect the media to tell people the truth. The days of being able to trust the press for the truth are long gone.
We shall see what we shall see. 

well duh...


We need more trashy congressmen?

Do you even get the point, or are you incapable of understanding things you don't like?

Cocaine in the White House? Doesn't matter. Rules are for everyday morons, not the special people.

If MTG holding up nasty photos makes the parasites squirm then she's got my blessing. There's nothing sacred about those offices any more.

Today the judge in Hunter's tax evasion case threw the DOJ and his defense team (redundant?) into a tizzy.

As the prosecution and defense both told the judge they came to a settlement agreement, the judge asked the prosecutor, "So, I don't see anything about amnesty for other charges.  There's no agreement concerning FARA charges.  Is it possible you may file additional charges in the future?"  (paraphrased)

The prosecution had no choice but to say, "Yes, your honor," because without it being documented, the court can't enforce any other agreements made outside the plea agreement.

That's when the defense chimed in, "We don't agree to this plea deal, your honor."

LOL! 

Obviously, the DOJ told his lawyers they would accept the tax misdemeanor, defer the gun charges for 6 months and it goes away, and promised (under the table) there would be no further charges.

Once the judge got it on the record that some charges were glaringly missing from the agreement making them fair game, it threw a monkey wrench in the backdoor deal.

I guess they found some creative way to sidestep the problem -- probably with some secret "get out of jail free" letter provided by the DOJ.

The plea deal went forward after that additional meeting.

But, hey, it's just Congress members who deserve to be called trashy.

More details.  The Hunter Biden case is ongoing.

The photos of Hunter Biden's exploits were available to the public already.

There was no need for her to show these images in this manner. Doing so was salacious and of very little evidentiary value.

What case need to be proved to the American people? That Hunter Biden took naked photos with alleged prostitutes? That is not part of proving Biden was taking bribes. Congress needs to focus on the big crimes, the crimes that may have been comitted by Biden. The FBI is never going to chase someone down because they had a liaison with a prostitute nor is it worth congress' time.
What matters are bank records, phone calls, statements made, all things that would go to show significant corruption and bribery. This simply isn't one of them.

Why was hunters laptop needed to be introduced prior? The FBI/DOJ has it and will do the right thing and not lose it.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

The photos of Hunter Biden's exploits were available to the public already.

There was no need for her to show these images in this manner. Doing so was salacious and of very little evidentiary value.

What case need to be proved to the American people? That Hunter Biden took naked photos with alleged prostitutes? That is not part of proving Biden was taking bribes. Congress needs to focus on the big crimes, the crimes that may have been comitted by Biden. The FBI is never going to chase someone down because they had a liaison with a prostitute nor is it worth congress' time.
What matters are bank records, phone calls, statements made, all things that would go to show significant corruption and bribery. This simply isn't one of them.

History is replete with criminals being smart enough to insulate themselves from law enforcement in areas where the stakes are extremely high. It's often the small potatoes that get those people caught and convicted. Once that happens, the criminal's life is turned upside down because the investigators now have probable cause to search homes and computers, freeze bank accounts, etc.  Leverage is often needed to get evidence of the bigger crimes.

Who among us will ever get a ridiculously lenient and corrupt plea deal like this?

It was broadcast on National Television.

Nobody watches broadcast TV.

Catch up!  It's a whole new "digital on demand' world!

It was broadcast on National Television.

Flapps comment remains as u havent answered it.

Typical.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Do you even get the point, or are you incapable of understanding things you don't like?

Maybe if you made an actual point.

Pointing out that my opinion is an opinion as if it were some rebuttal really isn't what I would consider a point.
I mean all you have to do is respond that you don't think it was trashy

Maybe if you made an actual point.

Pointing out that my opinion is an opinion as if it were some rebuttal really isn't what I would consider a point.

Once again you focused on the one sentence that had no point (other than the implication that your opinion is not fact).

Yet you continue to ignore the one sentence that did make an all too important point.