I was reading 1 article that said when israel occupied gaza, there were factories and the place was lively. Then when given to the Palastinians, its a shithole. They make no use od the area.
IDK how true this is.
I saw photos and video of the Jews vacating Gaza as the deadline to leave drew near. They were taking everything they could with them, leaving as little behind as possible.
They took light fixtures, pulled electric wires from the walls, all appliances of course, ... pretty much anything that wasn't part of the house framing was unscrewed, unbolted, un-nailed and ripped out.
These were after all the homes they'd built and lived in for decades. To have to get out and just give their homes to Arabs because Israel was forced to didn't mean they had to leave all the things they bought and built.
Now Israel is doing the same thing to Gaza -- telling the residents to leave ahead of an all-out military invasion.
The difference is, the residents are crying they have nowhere safe to flee.
Really? Israel was able to absorb the residents who fled before -- all those who had no other place to go.
Now ARABS are saying in a region of mostly ARABS they have no possible place to vacate to?
This reminds me of Syria, where the refugees were being denied entry in Arab countries. These Arabs really like to control their borders, huh? Yet they are quick to condemn Israel for building fences to secure their borders.
If they have nowhere to go, it's not Israel's problem. Hamas is a large, widespread group. They have to have sway with local nations to accommodate a couple million people.