Three times a charm?

PA Supreme Court has now issued a 3rd court order.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/pennsylvania-top-court-says-illegal-162711530.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=ma

So, if the counties saying they will not comply have already started their recount, and they mingled the illegal ballots in with the original ballots, i think the state should do one of two things:  (1) exclude those counties' ballots from the recount and only use their original totals, or (2) stop the recount completely and certify the results already tallied.

In addition, every person in those counties which violated the law should be arrested and receive the most severe criminal charges possible with no offers of plea deals.  They've already had 3 chances to avoid legal consequences after being told they were violating state election law. 

Hypothetically, every single illegal ballot they would have counted represents another voter being disenfranchised.  if you accept the vote of someone who did not submit a legal ballot, you are in turn canceling out the vote from someone who submitted a legal ballot but voted for the other candidate.  That is election interference and a direct attack on democracy under the guise of "counting every vote."  How about we just count every LEGAL vote, and quit acting like the process is too hard for all voters to get it right?  It's not that hard to write the date.

They know that there will be consequences, so why not cheat more/again.

They know that there will be consequences, so why not cheat more/again.

If they think there's a chance to win, then the ends justifies the means -- and the consequences.

The court needs to tell them, if you cheat, your county will be disqualified. 

Good luck with those lawsuits from constituents you caused to lose their legit votes.  Qualified immunity should be stripped since they knowingly and willfully are violating elections policy and state law.

And enjoy the job search.  Who wants to hire someone who ignores laws to push their personal agenda?  Maybe guilty criminals looking for a shady defense attorney?   

In more rational, common sense dictated times, any member of the government who openly challenges a court ruling would have been immediately fired and replaced.

You work for the people, and you took an oath to uphold and obey the law.  You can't then decide which laws are worth following and ignore ones you believe are invalid.

The laws existed well before the election.  Where were the challenges then?  Only when a Republican wins does the law become unconstitutional.

Fire everyone who voted to count illegal ballots.

Why did the 2024 election have such a small number of election integrity complaints compared to 2020?

Lara Trump
Co-chair of the Republican National Committee
Assumed office March 8, 2024