1. 2aHawaii
  2. General Topics
  3. Political Discussion
  4. Election Fraud Evidence Thread
Print
Pages: 1 ... 69 70 [71] 72 73 ... 143

Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 530081 times)

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1400 on: January 02, 2021, 12:34:22 PM »
it's like our illegal aerial fireworks here. SO much evidence but no one cares enough to prosecute anyone. We accept it. We don't care. As long as we get our stuff.
"If lust and hate is the candy..." Natalie was singing about the media - but can apply to all the stuff we are content with.
Logged
Deeds Not Words

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1401 on: January 02, 2021, 01:34:31 PM »
Quote from: eyeeatingfish on January 02, 2021, 09:49:07 AM
What you say is true, yet problem is there really isn't much evidence that large numbers of illegal ballots were accepted.

Logged
The F in Communism stands for Food

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1402 on: January 02, 2021, 02:17:46 PM »
Quote from: eyeeatingfish on January 02, 2021, 09:49:07 AM
What you say is true, yet problem is there really isn't much evidence that large numbers of illegal ballots were accepted.

The problem is there were witnesses and anomalies in all key swing states.
We know that only the swing states stopped counting votes on election night and that Trump was ahead at each time they stopped.  Never happened before in history.
We know one GA counting center at State Farm Stadium reported a "Water Main Break" as a reason for stopping the count.  It was a lie.
We know machines switched votes, either on their own or with the help of tabulators.
We know lots of GOP observers (and no Democrat observers) were ejected from counting centers. 
We know there had to be court orders to force counting center supervisors to allow GOP observers to see the ballots -- and the supervisors continued to ignore the orders.
We know there are abnormalities in the results.  In Georgia, no candidate has ever garnered 75% of a county's votes in the history of presidential elections.  Biden got 90-93% in 51 precincts, 94% in 51 precincts, 95% in 36 precincts and 96-100% in 36 precincts. 
During the initial election night counts, Trump's totals were decreased by about 30,000 votes.  Tallies are RUNNING TOTALS that should always show an increase, not a decresse
There was an exact switch of 12,173 votes from Trump to Biden that happened over an 8 minute timespan.  The fact that an exact match in the number added for Biden and subtracted for Trump could only be explained by tampering.
Why does almost every single "hiccup" in this election, whether it was machine vote switching, massive jumps in vote totals after 3am ballot deliveries, and so on favor Biden and disadvantage Trump?  Generally in one direction and not the other.  If the problems were "normal", there would be an equal distribution of "hiccups" favoring each candidate, not just one.

One of the biggest red flags has been the lack of explanation offered for all the numerical, data-based abnormalities.  Trump won 18 of 19 bellweather counties, but lost.  How could  losing the state after decades of adherence to these bellweather counties -- election after election -- be explained?  No one has offered any explanation.  When they can't offer a rational, logical explanation, the only thing left to assume is that the truth is bad for Biden.

None of this argues ballot harvesting, duplicating ballots, changing markings of ballots, double voting or dead people voting.  All of that is a distraction from the tampering and cheating that went on after the ballots were cast.  This is all about what the data represents and how the count was manipulated.

Hand recounts have been discounted by many experts as inaccurate.  So, how did almost every single county report identical numbers from election night in the recount?  Some reports stated that the Sec of State only certified the election night count numbers anyway, so the recount did nothing.

This has some dry, data integrity testimony, but anyone who grasps what they are saying will be pissed that the state is ignoring the truth about election interference in their state:


« Last Edit: January 02, 2021, 05:33:15 PM by Flapp_Jackson »
Logged
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

groveler

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1403 on: January 02, 2021, 03:58:49 PM »
Quote from: ren on January 02, 2021, 12:34:22 PM
it's like our illegal aerial fireworks here. SO much evidence but no one cares enough to prosecute anyone. We accept it. We don't care. As long as we get our stuff.
"If lust and hate is the candy..." Natalie was singing about the media - but can apply to all the stuff we are content with.

She has good teeth,
Logged

QUIETShooter

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1404 on: January 02, 2021, 04:45:24 PM »
I am anticipating next week's senate meeting when courageous congressmen and senators band together to protest the electoral college results that certify that biden is the president-elect.

I am proud that they are standing up against the results of the election and if there was some way I can stand with them I surely would.

All I know is that there is a tremendous amount of Americans that need to see this movement by brave congressmen and senators.

It may seem as a futile effort by those who feel nothing productive or positive will come out of this display of resistance.

But in my opinion this final gesture of defiance will stoke the fires of solidarity that will be a fearful force to reckon with in 2022 and beyond. 

Logged
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1405 on: January 02, 2021, 09:00:21 PM »
Quote from: Flapp_Jackson on January 02, 2021, 07:37:58 AM
If the cheaters are being protected by the states' leaders, they will cheat.  The kinds of cheating that happened ensures that if one method is caught and able to be undone so the real numbers are found, it doesn't undo the other methods.

Recounts only go so far.  Mail-in ballots with poor signature matching, no or late "received" dates, invalid envelopes, missing privacy envelopes, no birthdate, impossible birthdates, wrong addresses, no addresses, illegal addresses, ... all of it was supposed to be verified, and the ones not in compliance with the law were to be thrown out.  Instead, Democrat districts were allowed to "cure" these kinds of ballots, but someone "forgot" to tell Republican districts they, too, could cure their voters' ballots.  One the ballots are cured (or pretended to be cured) by Democrat precincts, those ballots go in the "good to go" stack.  The ones not cured by Republicans go in the "illegal ballot" stack.  Recount after recount, the same ballots will yield the same numbers, because none of the physical ballots change. Why would they?  They are 70-99% for Biden, even in counties that voted overwhelmingly for Trump in 2016.

This is just one example of how crooked the election was run.  If you think they can't do a hand recount and magically get the exact same numbers as before, you're smoking something that should disqualify you from owning guns.

My post was in response to the accusation that the electronic voting machines were corrupted.  But if the physical hand count didn't turn out irregularities, then that must be a false accusation.  All the other things can be disproven in other means but the exact reason cited by those politicians is incorrect in this case.  I believe you are "smoking something".  If you think the conspiracy and corruption is so deep that you can force thousands of hand counters and officials to falsify results so exact. 

As for the flip, its entirely plausible.  I voted for Trump in 2016 and would never vote for him in 2020, and that's just one flip.  Not to mention all the new voters who normally don't vote and just hate Trump. 
Logged

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1406 on: January 02, 2021, 10:39:17 PM »
.
Logged
Deeds Not Words

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1407 on: January 02, 2021, 10:50:38 PM »
It’s not true because I say so and that should be good enough for everyone else
Logged
The F in Communism stands for Food

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1408 on: January 03, 2021, 12:35:13 PM »
Not a smidgeon of evidence that the election was stolen ...


This is exactly why only a hand "audit" (not an actual recount, and not one using the machines) was performed in Georgia.  if they only recount a "statistically significant sample" looking for illegal individual ballots, they not only get to select a sample they know is comprised of only legit ballots, but they also avoid having to explain how there are tens of thousands more votes in the certified total than there are actual ballots.

You really don't have to be a smart man -- just one with more sense than a billy goat.  Rescanning ballots was reported by a number of witnesses.  It's just ONE WAY to create more votes for Biden than he received in the election.

p.s. By law, they are required to allow GOP and DEM  observers to oversee the counting of ballots.  Where are they?


« Last Edit: January 03, 2021, 12:41:18 PM by Flapp_Jackson »
Logged
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1409 on: January 03, 2021, 01:27:23 PM »
Yeah that is pretty much what I expected. Nice job, Georgia
Logged
The F in Communism stands for Food

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1410 on: January 03, 2021, 02:01:40 PM »
Quote from: Flapp_Jackson on January 03, 2021, 12:35:13 PM
Not a smidgeon of evidence that the election was stolen ...


This is exactly why only a hand "audit" (not an actual recount, and not one using the machines) was performed in Georgia.  if they only recount a "statistically significant sample" looking for illegal individual ballots, they not only get to select a sample they know is comprised of only legit ballots, but they also avoid having to explain how there are tens of thousands more votes in the certified total than there are actual ballots.

You really don't have to be a smart man -- just one with more sense than a billy goat.  Rescanning ballots was reported by a number of witnesses.  It's just ONE WAY to create more votes for Biden than he received in the election.

p.s. By law, they are required to allow GOP and DEM  observers to oversee the counting of ballots.  Where are they?



Oh no, follow the law and not the science

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Logged

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1411 on: January 03, 2021, 02:13:48 PM »


Quote from: Flapp_Jackson on January 03, 2021, 12:35:13 PM
Not a smidgeon of evidence that the election was stolen ...




You really don't have to be a smart man -- just one with more sense than a billy goat. 



That's where you're wrong bucko.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Logged

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1412 on: January 03, 2021, 07:56:09 PM »
Quote from: changemyoil66 on January 03, 2021, 02:13:48 PM

That's where you're wrong bucko.


Elaborate, please, Buckaroo.   :geekdanc:
Logged
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1413 on: January 03, 2021, 09:25:43 PM »
Complain about fraud....get caught on tape asking to magic some votes so he can win.

Only trump can make nixon look good.



This is sad....complain about fraud and want fraud  :crazy: :crazy:
« Last Edit: January 03, 2021, 09:32:28 PM by omnigun »
Logged

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1414 on: January 03, 2021, 10:15:11 PM »
.
Logged
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1415 on: January 03, 2021, 10:16:53 PM »
I like the new Ted Cruz a lot better than the old one. It make me wonder if there was some sort of Count of Monte Cristo switcheroo and now Beardless Ted is sitting in a dark hole chewing on rats at the Chateu d'If

Logged
The F in Communism stands for Food

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1416 on: January 04, 2021, 09:24:31 AM »
Quote from: Flapp_Jackson on January 03, 2021, 07:56:09 PM
Elaborate, please, Buckaroo.   :geekdanc:

You;'re statement of not having to be a smart man or have sense to recognize fraud.  Lots of smart people out there, but TDS kicks in and all logic goes out the window.  But also lots of morons too.
Logged

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1417 on: January 04, 2021, 04:40:51 PM »
More from proj veritas. Guess they be doing the FBIs job for them. Got top peeps to admit using the same address for homeless people for years. GA law states where they reside must be used, even if its at a park. But for some reason a fake same "residence" is used and by the thousands estimated.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Logged

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1418 on: January 04, 2021, 05:55:07 PM »
Quote from: changemyoil66 on January 04, 2021, 04:40:51 PM
More from proj veritas. Guess they be doing the FBIs job for them. Got top peeps to admit using the same address for homeless people for years. GA law states where they reside must be used, even if its at a park. But for some reason a fake same "residence" is used and by the thousands estimated.

That's the problem.  These people have been sidestepping the laws for so long, they don't think anyone is ever going to enforce them -- so they have no reason to ever stop.

I'm not just referring to election laws, either...

Logged
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1419 on: January 05, 2021, 02:53:32 PM »
Well, tomorrow is the 6th. And I think it is going to be a wild ride. The media is already spinning this whole thing as a conspiracy and a coupe attempt even though I believe than Pence and the congressmen will follow the Constitution to the letter. Unfortunately, I don’t think that the senators and representatives objecting to the elections of the contested states will obtain the desired outcome. From what I understand is that they will use precedence to request a bipartisan panel to investigate the fraud. It is just difficult for me to believe that the Democrats will take any of the fraud proof seriously as most of them have benefitted from the fraud. The Republicans don’t have the votes and the Democrats and RINOs won’t vote in favor of removing the contested electors even tho the evidence is quite large, overwhelming and more than enough to change the outcome. Mostly due to TDS. So it comes down to whether they can convince Pence to throw out the contested electors from the contested states that broke the law in order to steal the election. If that happens then Trump has a chance. But I am not so sure about Pence. While I think he is an overtly honest man I don’t know if he has the balls to do what is s obviously right. Especially since he has already stated he is done with politics. Really? Right before the biggest day of your political career? I could be wrong and I hope I am.

The odds are totally against Trump. Things are not cut and dried. And the strategy has a lot of holes that the Democrats will exploit. Our courts are obviously corrupted. There will be rioting and destruction if Trump does end up winning. And there are already threats of this and threats on congressmen's’ lives. So we’ll see. How it plays out. There is a lot that has to be overcome in order to have the desired outcome. I just don’t know if overwhelming evidence is going to be enough to change the minds of those who benefitted from the election fraud to vote to remove the contested electors. If nothing else it will be an exciting couple of days I think.
Logged
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!
Print
Pages: 1 ... 69 70 [71] 72 73 ... 143
« previous next »