Great
I know that as does most any other 2a person. but now you give them a reason and the info to ban hand guns ? 
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence began in 1974 as the National Council to Control Handguns (NCCH).
From 1980 through 2000 it operated under the name Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI).
In 2001, it was renamed the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, and its sister project, the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, was renamed the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
The nonprofits rebranded as Brady in February 2019, on the 25th anniversary of the implementation of the Brady Bill.
So, basically, as their objectives changed from handgun control to all firearms, Brady, along with other groups, changed their names and focus.
Handguns were demonized in the 70s and 80s as only used by gangs and criminals. Back then, Cops carried revolvers, so it was easy to scare people with stories of quick reloads with magazines holding upwards of 30 rounds. The police were simply out-gunned, so departments and state police agencies started issuing semi-autos. Once that happened, and more and more "civilians" started buying them as well, the courts ruled that the handguns were no longer subject to bans as they were now in common and widespread use by the public.
It's very doubtful there will be a resurgence in the effort to ban semi-auto handguns. It failed before -- it'll continue to fail.
The AWB of 1994 also failed in that it was allowed to sunset in 2004. Nothing changed in that time. In fact, Columbine happened, proving that bans can't stop mass shootings.
California has had the most mass shootings of any state, and the types of semi-auto rifles allowed there is very strict.
There's no evidence that bans of any type of firearm stops, or even reduces the number of deaths, from mass shootings.